This is our current schedule for SQL backup:
Backups created by Enterprise Manager
Nightly backup 12:00midnight - Complete backup checked, Transaction Log Backup not checked
Weekly optimization on Saturday - Optimization and Ingetrigy checked.
Transaction Logs Every hour 8am to 9pm - Transaction Log Backup checked.
Is it overkill to include the Transaction Log backup on our Nightly backup ?
Thanks
--
Message posted via http://www.sqlmonster.comHi Jeffrey,
If you are ending transaction log backup at 9 PM and want to take
transaction log backup again at midnight, it will have 3 hrs of transactions.
But you are anyways taking full back up at midnight. I do not understand why
you want to take nightly transaction log backup.
If my understanding is wrong, please update me with more information.
--
Thanks
GYK|||Hi GYK,
I don't want to do transaction logs again. Sorry a bit dizzy doing this backup plan. You confirmed what I was second guessing that if I have 3 hours of transactions between 9pm and 12 (which is rare) they would be part of the complete backup at midnight with no need for the TRN backup.
Thanks
Jeff
--
Message posted via http://www.sqlmonster.com|||Keep in mind that the FULL and DIFFERNTIAL database backups are independent
from the LOG transaction log backups.
The transaction log will not remove transactions from the files until after
a transaction log backup is performed if you are running any recovery mode
except simple. A FULL nor a DIFFERENTIAL database backup does NOT remove
transactions from the transaction log regardless of the recovery model.
Sincerely,
Anthony Thomas
"Jeffrey Sheldon via SQLMonster.com" <forum@.SQLMonster.com> wrote in message
news:418f0f5db2de404da1b2043e344372d5@.SQLMonster.com...
Hi GYK,
I don't want to do transaction logs again. Sorry a bit dizzy doing this
backup plan. You confirmed what I was second guessing that if I have 3
hours of transactions between 9pm and 12 (which is rare) they would be part
of the complete backup at midnight with no need for the TRN backup.
Thanks
Jeff
--
Message posted via http://www.sqlmonster.com
No comments:
Post a Comment